Contract Law

----------------------- 1. Note whether this transaction is governed by UCC or the Restatement. 2. Does the Statute of Frauds go through? The trim down must be in writing if it is in examine to land, if by its nature it takes more(prenominal) than one course of study to perform, or if it is in regard to goods of greater than $500 value. Is in that location a root? Was in that location an Offer? Were the harm particular(prenominal)? Did the head imply the partys intent to be bound? Was in that location an Acceptance? Was in that location adoption to use up terms of the offer pursuant to mirror image regulation? If not, bottomland UCC 2.207 or the parties effect be used to refer a contract? Was the adoption made according to offers to instructions (note silence enkindle never be acceptance)? Was the acceptance made within time specified? Does the postbox obtain apply? Was the re Consideration? Was there effectual injustice? No No No No contract Yes No Was there reliance so that §90 Promissory Estoppel applies? Was there benefit conferred? Are all of the cloth terms concur on? Yes Yes Yes No THERE IS AN ENFORCEABLE CONTRACT What argon Material Terms? Unilateral or Bilateral? Was there an outright scandalise or is it another problem? Were parties far enough in negotiations to implicate a contract to speech over in Good Faith? Was such a contract explicit? Was an option created by partial transaction of acceptance? Yes No Was there Substantial break leaping? Yes Was there fraud, duress or unconscionability? Yes No Breach is excuse Was there a change in flock or failure of a substantial assumption of the contract? Yes No Breach is excused Could there be a run? Was the breach excused by implication of past performance? Breach is exc used Breach unexcused; victim can recover! GO TO DAMAGES Yes No Is there vagueness/ ambiguity in contract? Can the Parol...If you requisite to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper