'Comlaw Aropa Assignment Essay\r'

'Question 1\r\n furnish is an expression of willingness to enter into a jurally binding contract on the ground proposed once the advise is acquiesceed. This letter is an fracture since the terms proposed are complete and it is talk to the postee. The letter was definitely sent to Andrew by mistake since the high society makes this supply whole to their regular nodes and to those who have signed gigantic term supply contract. Andrew did not take both these conditions. According to the case of McMahon v Gilberd & Co, the ‘reward’ for each returned fruity drink bottle is made to their customer except. Technically, the bottle dealer is not their customer and therefore the case was in sound. In conclusion, although Andrew replied to the bid before the deadline, the company has no sanctioned obligation to supply Andrew.\r\nQuestion 2\r\nIn this situation, Sarah has met the term of the abide as she has expressed willingness to enter into a lawfully bind ing contract. The reply from Sarah shows that she agreed to accept the crevice for 300 tonnes. Her supplicate to hive away the fertilizers in early October is merely a request for information since she is willing to stipend for the delay. It is not a counter twirl by Sarah as she is willing to elate the fertilizers if the company does not agree to her request. Therefore, the offer is still valid as she was only requesting for more information. Similarly, in the case of Stevenson v McLean, the plaintiffs telegraph was only a request for information and is not a counter offer. Thus, the offeror has legal obligation to portion out to the plaintiff since he has accepted the offer via post. The email sent by the company to Sarah on 21 July to revoke the offer is invalid because she has already accepted the offer. repeal of offer can only be done before the communication of toleration by the offeree. The method of reply apply by Sarah through email is valid as long as it is not less advantageous to the offeror although the offer was sent via post. In conclusion, the company has the legal obligation to supply fertilizers to Sarah since her acceptance of offer is valid.\r\n'