Liting Wang

Liting WangProfessor FeindertENGWR 48016April 2018Critique of in that respect Is Need to Review Our nurture SystemEducation is the nigh powerful weapon which you potbelly mathematical function to change the world, saidNelson Mandela. The Africa News Service published the article there Is Need to ReviewOur Education System on April 1, 2009 by Rhoda Kalema, a long-familiar author and titleholder of Ugandas Forum for Women in Democracy as a transformative drawing card 1996.The article looks at some pressing issues that the didactics trunk of Uganda before long faces. There pee-pee been no proper mechanisms to expect high-quality education offered in the expanse. First, she explains that the experience of educated spate shows their fear towards the future to come of the contemporary education around the world.If people do not have effective education, they result not have a bright future. As a result, a country like Uganda might fall back and will be left very wonky. It w ill affect the countrys improvement in many ways. Second, she suggests that the education administration should start focusing on this situation. In addition, both learners and teachers face challenges that make it impossible for the education system to be bedded anywhere in the world.The judicature is awargon of these challenges barely offers no solution. done critique, the key issues facing the primary, secondary, and vocational education in Uganda are examined. There is no definite opinion from the author that is currently viable to restore the whole situation.The author fails to mention the mechanisms that have fuelled the failure of the education system but only comes up with assumptions. Even though the article could be persuasive to an extent because of the clear organization, the notes lack of sources and yards, grammatical issues, vague statuss, and weak arguments confuse readers.The article has a clear organization following an introduction, and lists the important delegates as subheadings, and a conclusion. Although the author has clear points in the article, she does not hand over enough differentiate and sources to support them. The author organizes the article into sections and follows with examples which is effective because it is everyday for readers to understand the ideas. However, the article does not include any sources and examples from other authors.This would chew the fat for the Government to improve on the few available vocational institutions, general anatomy many new and modern ones, and create regional vocational and good instructors training colleges (Paragraph 8). This and a few other examples appear to like her individualized opinions and her thoughts because sources are missing.Readers cannot trust the author easily. Additionally, the body paragraphs do not have transitional give-and-takes, so the article does not flow well. Numerous grammar and punctuation mark mistakes are evident all over the article. For ins tance, the author presents a non-standard incredulity Why then stop a parent from feeding his/her low-down fry? And why stop a headteacher and his staff their role to plan indoctrinate meals for their students? (Paragraph 17). Several grammatical errors show failure to proofread some of the sentences.For instance, in paragraph 5 she mentions The Ministry of Education should invite retired and current educationists forconsultations, sic also the non-governmental organizations with the Y come out of the closethDevelopment Programmes could be consulted. The education syllabus development, most importantly of necessity experienced and elicit persons in this field and not only the appointed civil servants and technocrats.She does not avoid vague terms and presents them without any explanation.For example, she writes Teach the young people skills and they will never be lost children (Paragraph 7). Skills is a vague term which needs more than specification. Another example of vague w ord choices is Since this parameter cannot be easily refuted, then we should mourn the future of our country (Paragraph 2).The word easily could have been improved. Some of the authors arguments are presented in random and visually change manner. The author presents most of her points with no illustrations or citations. The author points out the most exciting factors in the education system. For example, Everyone in the country and however those outdoor(a) who have ever experienced a balanced education roughly 25-30 years ago is in pain over what is happening in the education sphere (Paragraph 1).As evident from the article, there is no evidence of any citation where the author got the information from, and this puts into question the credibility of her information. The author uses weak arguments to make logical appeals. For example, Then at one clipping about 3,500 or 350 were crossed off the payroll (shortly after they were reinstated, so we read.) (Paragraph 10).The strengt h of this posting is rooted in the authors inability to bring out points to illustrate the failures that are evident to every reader of the article. Anything that contributes to meeting the great needs of the education systems in Africa is positive, such as programs or projects goaded by people who want to serve the general good of the country in the area.The impression that one gets is that there is a desire to be involved in proposing the beginnings of a solution, a standard foundation for article of faith that will integrate specific local features and at the same condemnation will train future citizens of an interconnected and culturally mixed world. A change of school learning system will reflect this concept, and it is an provoke one.The author points out the importance of reviewing the education system by openhanded an example of what needs to be done. What we need is the Government to devote a sizeable portion of the budget to education in 2009-2010, construct double, a nd common chord floor classrooms in the existing schools. Only then will our education system be on the right track. (Paragraph 21).Moreover, everyone in the country and even those that have been lucky to secure jobs outside the country never experienced a balanced education about 25-30 years ago, and it is for this reason that they are in pain over what is happening in the education system. (Paragraph 1). Nevertheless, she fails to point out what is bothering them is and that Ugandas future is doomed to be.The author should provide a more detailed example and offer insight into what vocational and technical institutions focus. Summing up the topic, in general, does not provide any help to the government as the government requires a practical approach to issues not only a theoretical approach.The author does not explain that the revised curriculum needs to focus on the vocational and technical teaching, to provide skills together with the academic learning. In conclusion, the autho r has managed to create a list of reasons that would help the government and relevant stakeholders argue their case mostly for naught. While like-minded individuals can pull some rhetorical questions to get others thinking, there is little offered in the way of credible argument material.The author also fails to suggest that conspirators and cartels in government hard are working to manufacture a crisis in educational reform. Policy elites are not knowingly falsifying evidence or collectively coming to a secret agreement about how to terrify the public. She also fails to discuss that school reformers inhabit a small and relatively closed network.Policy leaders and stakeholders can accelerate the measure of development. The article is organized in a pleasant and way that makes the posting readable.From the article, it is clear the author has some arguments to make which are sensible but fails to bring out the issue affecting the education system in Uganda in a way that is convincing . Overall, the article is well summed up, but a few improvements in certain elements would have helped in coming up with a more organized piece than what the author has delivered.